absoffthewake

http://www.seadoosportboat.com/

some people just dont have any dignity anymore....

This thread was directed towards 2 cycle rotax users like the title in all caps and bold suggested, not mercury users. Mercury's do not strain thier pistons and sleves like the rotax does. TC-W3 works great for mercury, but it is crap for rotax.

To prevent offending other Mercury Users, I have modified my post to read:

As we all know, these standards mean nothing to us Rotax users because they will do not provide enough protection against engine failure in Rotax or Aircooled (Like the ones featured in Ultralites) engines. This standard does not even meet API TC’s engine protection, as it was not designed to withstand the typical challenges of an Air-Cooled Engine (or in our case, a high horsepower, high RPM, high temperature Rotax engine).

Hey Jeff... I live in Ft Myers, FL and would be happy to drive to your place and let you tinker with my Seadoo Challenger 1800 with Twin Engines if you make it worth the drive

The forums are structured this way already. See here, http://seadoosportbo...howforum_7.html. Look at the sub-forums here, all the doo models are broken down like this for their specific model.

I have a 1998 Challenger 1800 that has the Twin 110hp Rotax, so does the Speedster 160 as you demonstrated. Our engine concerns are the same. So we should have 1 forum for both of us... A Speedster user would never see my post.