2012 Challenger 180SE 255HP
#1
Posted 07 January 2012 - 09:56 PM
#2
Posted 11 January 2012 - 12:29 AM
cheers
#3
Posted 11 January 2012 - 08:28 AM
I had the option of getting a 180 SP as three are landing here in OZ shortly. but for a 10k premium i settled for a 2011 runout challenger 180 SE which is the same boat as the 2012 but lacks the itc controls.
Edited by moochy, 13 January 2012 - 05:50 AM.
Edited to correct to SP model rather than SE model
#4
Posted 11 January 2012 - 09:23 AM
Actually I think the SP is the one with the really nice paint job, orange detailing and ski mode. The 180SE as compared to the 180 has four speakers instead of two, the bimini top, the filler cushion in the front, stainless steel cupholders & pullup cleats, the option for the HO engine, 22 functions instead of 21 in the digital information center, cockpit and bow cover and snap in carpet.
I can't see spending the extra money on the SP either... I think I'll be very happy with the SE. I *thought* about a 2011 model but I like the new features of the 2012.
#5
Posted 11 January 2012 - 09:35 AM
Here are some shots of the tower collapsed and the tool needed, this is the 230 SP pictured but the 180 SP would function very similar.
http://seadoosportbo...ils-tower-down/
http://seadoosportbo...-release-lever/
Want to spread the word about SeaDooSportBoats.com and sport some official SDSB Gear? See what we have to offer here, http://seadoosportboats.com/gear
#6
Posted 11 January 2012 - 10:19 AM
http://www.sea-doo.n...hallengerSE.pdf
#7
Posted 12 January 2012 - 11:26 AM
#8
Posted 12 January 2012 - 02:41 PM
What are the differences between the 2011 and 2012 Sea-doo 180 SE challenger?
The 2012 has:
ECO Mode
Cruise Control
Fuel Consumption Meter
Docking Mode
Intelligent Throttle Control
Neutral Lock
Circuit Breakers
Everything that is highlighted in red on the pdf that I posted the link to.
I have another question... Is there an advantage of having two motors instead of one on a 180SE?
#9
Posted 12 January 2012 - 03:45 PM
. . . or the neutral lock... Does the impeller actually stop?
I have a 210 Challenger which introduced the iTC features. The neutral lock is just simply a result of changing from the mechanical throttle control from the 2011 to the electronic control with the iTC. In the 2011 model, you actually had two controls, one for throttle and one for "shifting" (fwd, neutral, rev). With iTC controls, there is only one control now that handles throttle and shifting. The lever locks in neutral position unlike the 2-lever setup. In any case, the impeller never stops.
How does the fuel consumption meter differ from the gas gauge?
My 210 has an analog fuel gauge as well as the fuel consumption meter. The fuel consumption meter will tell you the real-time fuel usage in GPH and as well as an overall average GPH.
- moochy likes this
#10
Posted 13 January 2012 - 06:00 AM
I have a 210 Challenger which introduced the iTC features. The neutral lock is just simply a result of changing from the mechanical throttle control from the 2011 to the electronic control with the iTC. In the 2011 model, you actually had two controls, one for throttle and one for "shifting" (fwd, neutral, rev). With iTC controls, there is only one control now that handles throttle and shifting. The lever locks in neutral position unlike the 2-lever setup. In any case, the impeller never stops.
From what I can see the 2012 180 series still has the two lever system on both the challenger and SP. Anyone with a 2012 series know how neutral lock works with these models?
#11
Posted 13 January 2012 - 12:09 PM
From what I can see the 2012 180 series still has the two lever system on both the challenger and SP. Anyone with a 2012 series know how neutral lock works with these models?
Thanks Moochy. I stand corrected. I would agree it does look like the 2 lever setup is still in use in the 2012. I just assumed they went to the single lever with the iTC.
#12
Posted 15 January 2012 - 02:02 AM
#13
Posted 15 January 2012 - 10:27 PM
#14
Posted 26 February 2012 - 11:25 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users